Oversight and Transparency
OVERSIGHT · Audit · Hearing · Information Disclosure
The particularity of the Wallfacer Project lies in the "intent exemption," but the exemption covers only intent—money, personnel, and procedures are all made public. This section serves as the entry point to the oversight system and public procedures.
Oversight System
| Mechanism | Remarks |
|---|---|
| Post-facto Audit | Funding for the Wallfacer Project is allocated separately and subject only to post-facto audit (Article 11 of the Wallfacer Act); the Joint Audit Team is composed of the audit authorities of the permanent members. |
| Hearing | Major resource allocations are subject to hearings in accordance with regulations; Wallfacers have the right to legally refuse to explain their intent (records are still made public). |
| Oversight Baseline | Exemption of strategic intent does not exempt crimes; the actions of Wallfacers must not violate mandatory provisions of relevant national laws (Article 9). |
| Information Disclosure | Ledgers, hearing records, and procedural documents are made public upon request (see "information disclosure request") |
Two Frequently Asked Questions
- "If intent is not scrutinized, could it spiral out of control?" The judgment of loss of control requires a normative standard as a reference, and only the Wallfacer himself knows the normative standard of the Wallfacer Project. The institutional choice is to scrutinize funds, personnel, and procedures, but not thoughts. This is a balance struck by the Act, not an oversight.
- "What can post-event audits recover?"—Audits cannot recover intentions, but they can confirm that every resource was genuinely used for its declared allocation category, with no embezzlement. To date, the first round of audits has found no fund flows outside the ledgers.
The legal provisions for the oversight mechanism are set forth in "Overview of the Project – Wallfacer Act".