Official Statements
This column centrally collects all previous official statements issued by the Council regarding the true strategic intent of Wallfacers. Such statements are periodically re-published—not because there is nothing new to say, but because this statement itself is the Council's most critical information.
Explanation Regarding the True Strategic Intentions of Wallfacers
The Committee reiterates, pursuant to Article 5 of the Wallfacer Act, that the Committee and all its staff are unaware of the true strategic intentions of any Wallfacer. This is not secrecy, but inherent to the design of the Project. All claims that the Committee possesses such knowledge are unfounded.
Statement on Requesting the Public to Refrain from Speculating on Wallfacer Intentions
All speculation, compilation, and commercial activities under the guise of "interpreting Wallfacers" lack factual basis; the public's systematic speculation will enter the analytical purview of the Trisolaran world via Sophons, objectively constituting assistance to enemy intelligence operations. Please reserve your curiosity for the ledgers and hearing records published on this site.
Official Response to the Circulated "Truth of the Wallfacer Project"
Recent circulation on multiple platforms of the so-called "comprehensive picture of the Wallfacer Project disclosed by insiders." Upon investigation, the relevant content lacks document numbers, sources, and cannot be correlated with public ledgers. Details of the verification are available in the Fact Check column. Reiteration: The document numbers and bulletins published on this site shall prevail.
Explanation regarding the personal living arrangements of Wallfacers
Public opinion has questioned whether the resource usage of Wallfacers (particularly the Wallfacer Luo Ji) is "unrelated to defense." The Committee clarifies: how Wallfacers utilize their time and resources for living arrangements falls within their strategic freedom; public disclosure of ledgers and post-event audits constitute the entirety of the supervisory measures set forth in the Act. The Committee offers no interpretive bias on this matter.
Response to the claim that "the Committee is a rubber stamp"
Some views hold that the Committee "only approves funds without inquiring into matters," rendering it a mere figurehead. The Committee's response is: This is precisely the Committee designed by the Act. The inquiring party does not exist—that is the distinction between the Wallfacer Project and all secret projects in history.
Reiteration of the principle of public disclosure regarding the words and deeds of Wallfacers
The public actions of Wallfacers are never kept secret—the actions cannot be concealed from Sophons, nor are they concealed from the public. The chronology of movements and resource ledgers recorded on this site constitute their entire public record; all other "insider" information does not originate from this Committee.